Interference No. 101,981
viewed in light of the inventors previous research,
constituted conception of a single phase ReBa 2Cu3Ox material
of Tc above 70K.
Whether the Party Qadri was reasonably diligent, from the date of
conception, in reducing the invention to practice. is a
diligent activity toward reducing the invention to practice.
Whether an analysis comparable to neutron diffraction is
essential to a reduction to practice of the material
according to the count, given the state of knowledge in the
art which existed in March and April of 1987.
Whether the patent application of Party Batlogg does not
constitute constructive reduction to practice as of the
filing date because of its failure to contain a written
description of the invention and of the manner and process
of making it in such full, clear, and exact terms as to
enable any person skilled in the art to make and use it.
Whether the patent application of Party Beyers does not
constitute constructive reduction to practice as of the
filing date because of its failure to contain a written
description of the invention and of the manner and process
of making it in such full, clear, and exact terms as to
enable any person skilled in the art to make and use it.
Whether the patent application of Party Batlogg does not constitute
constructive reduction to practice as of the filing date
because of its failure to set forth the best mode contemplated
by the inventor at the time of filing.
Beyers
Batlogg (paper no. 225) has moved ( BaM4) under 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.635 to return Beyers’ brief, pursuant to § 1.618, since
Beyers’ brief does not contain a statement of the issues as
required by § 1.656.
In their opposition (paper no. 230) to Batlogg’s motion,
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007