MORRISON et al. V. MANNHEIMER et al. - Page 42




          Interference No. 103,197                                                      


          what the term "T.C." represents,  it is apparent from the64                                           
          description of the "2nd Generation Probe" at page 4 as "EKG +                 
          Oximeter + ThermoCouple + pH" that T.C. refers to a                           
          thermocouple.   Pages 3 and 5 of the exhibit show that the65                                                               
          "1st Generation Probe" can be a formed as a disposable unit                   
          connectable by an adapter to a "Standard oximeter - Nellcor,                  
          etc." and to a "Conventional Fetal Monitor (EKG)."                            
               Referring to page 4, as already noted, the "2nd                          
          Generation Probe" is described as being for "EKG + Oximeter +                 
          ThermoCouple + pH."  The top sketch and associated notation                   
          indicate that pH is to be measured by light passing through a                 
          pH sensitive dye (HPTS), whose absorption characteristics are                 
          very pH sensitive.   The bottom two sketches show that a                      
          hypodermic needle that contains, in addition to an "oximeter                  
          fiber," a chamber containing pH sensitive dye, a semi-                        
          permeable barrier wall for contact with the tissue, and two                   
          elements labeled "light in" and "light out," which Ted Johnson                

            MR 505:4-5.64                                                                       
            Ted Johnson’s testimony corroborates the existence of65                                                                       
          the pages of this exhibit on November 24, 1987.  It is not                    
          necessary for him to testify that he understood the contents                  
          of the drawing.  See Price v. Symsek, 988 F.2d 1187, 1195, 26                 
          USPQ2d 1031, 1037 (Fed. Cir. 1993).                                           
                                        - 39 -                                          





Page:  Previous  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007