Interference No. 103,197
Morrison's and Mannheimer's claims that correspond to the
count, i.e., Morrison claims 1-5, 8-24, 27, and 28 and
Mannheimer claims 1-11, 18-21, 86-104, and 106-108, which
means neither Morrison nor Mannheimer are entitled to a patent
including their respective claims. Judgment on the issue of
unpatentability over Kapany is hereby entered against
Buschmann's claims 1-3, 5-7, 12, 14, 19, 29, and 32. Judgment
on the issue of priority is therefore awarded in favor of the
remaining Buschmann claims that correspond to the count, i.e.,
claims 8, 9, 13, 18, 30, and 35-37, which means Buschmann is
entitled to a patent including those claims.
)
__________________________ )
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
) BOARD OF
__________________________ ) PATENT APPEALS
JOHN C. MARTIN ) AND
Administrative Patent Judge) INTERFERENCES
)
)
__________________________ )
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge)
- 93 -
Page: Previous 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007