THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 75
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
MASAAKI YAMADA, YASUJI FURUTANI, MITSUE NOTAKE
and JUNITI YAMAGISHI
Junior Party,1
v.
BHARAT B. AGGARWAL
Senior Party.2
_______________
Patent Interference No. 103,605
_______________
FINAL HEARING: July 7, 1999
_______________
Before CAROFF and METZ and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
1 Application 08/084,445, filed 07/01/93, now U.S. Patent No.
5,288,852, granted 02/22/94. Accorded benefit of serial nos.
07/089,134, filed 08/25/87, now abandoned; and 06/708,846, filed
03/05/85, now abandoned. Japanese applications 59-172307, filed
8/17/84; 59-82653, filed 4/23/84; and 59-43617, filed 3/6/84.
Assigned to Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan.
2 Application 08/375,052, filed 01/18/95. Accorded the benefit
of U.S. Application 08/191,751, filed 02/03/94, now abandoned;
07/915,038, filed 07/15/92, now abandoned; 06/677,454, filed
12/03/84, now abandoned; and 06/628,059, filed 07/05/84, now
abandoned. Assigned to Genentech, Inc..
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007