Interference No. 102,408
James, Jeffrey B. Medwid, Franz Scheidl, Stanley A. Lang,7 8 9 10
Bruce Heiser, and Frederick Durr to support a corroborated11 12
reduction to practice of seven compounds falling within the
scope of the count.
Facts
Junior party Child's brief at final hearing fails to
effectively aid this panel in understanding its case for
priority. See Ernst Haas Studio, Inc. v. Palm Press, Inc.,
164 F.3d 110, 112, 49 USPQ2d 1377, 1379 (2d Cir. 1999)
("Appellant's Brief is at best an invitation to the court to
scour the record, research any legal theory that comes to
mind, and serve generally as an advocate for appellant. We
7Declaration of John C. James dated September 25, 1992
(CR1-5).
8Declaration of Jeffrey B. Medwid dated September 29, 1992
(CR80-85).
9Declaration of Franz Scheidl dated September 30, 1992
(CR189-91).
10Declaration of Stanley A. Lang dated September 29, 1992
(CR218-20).
11Declaration of Bruce Heiser dated September 29, 1992
(CR225-27).
12Declaration of Frederick Durr dated September 29, 1992
(CR285-89).
10
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007