BROOKS et al. V. IKEDA et al. V. HODGSON et al. - Page 4


                 Interference No. 103378                                                                                  

                 designated with Abbott A-code number5 A-79935.  (BR-149, ¶ 13, Laboratory                                
                 notebook # 39005, p.111).  A-79935 was subjected to NMR testing, #164600 on                              
                 November 14, 1990.  (BR 440-49, BX-31).   Rodriques stated that the NMR                                  
                 showed a 45:55 ratio of diastereomers in this preparation. (BR 149, ¶ 13, BR                             
                 181, BX15).  Dr. Steinman is said to corroborate Rodriques’ testimony.  (BB 8).                          
                 Dr. Bell testified that he supervised the testing of the cyclobutyl N-hydroxyurea                        
                 and hydroxamic acid compounds described in the involved patent for their ability                         
                 to inhibit in vitro leukotriene B4 (LTB4) biosynthesis in heparinized human blood                        
                 and in vivo leukotriene biosynthesis in rats when dosed orally.  (BR 121-22, ¶ 2).                       
                 Bell testified that the computer printouts (BX-30) show that compound A-79935,                           
                 prepared by Rodriques, had an in vitro HWBL IC50 of 0.33µM and an in vivo ED50                           
                 of 93 µmol/kg when tested on December 18, 1990 and February 21, 1991,                                    
                 respectively. (BR 122-23, ¶¶ 3-4).                                                                       
                         As noted supra, Brooks conducted no tests before November 27, 1990 to                            
                 establish a practical utility of compound A-79935.  Notwithstanding this fact,                           
                 Brooks urge that it is not necessary for them to test for utility to establish a                         
                 reduction to practice because in their view, the utility of the compounds of the                         
                 count is obvious.  In support of their position of obviousness, Brooks rely upon                         
                 the affidavit opinions of coinventor Brooks and Dr. Kreft (Kreft).   Coinventor                          
                 Brooks testified that he wrote the entry “5-LO”, shorthand for “5-lipoxygenase”, in                      
                 his notebook because it was his belief that the cyclobutyl N-hydroxyureas he                             


                                                                                                                          
                         5 An Abbott A-code number was given to a compound when it was determined to                      
                 be analytically pure and submitted to the drug sample room.  (BR 147, ¶ 5).                              

                                                            4                                                             



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007