CHRIST et al. V. BLAKE - Page 4




          Interference No. 103,435                                                    




          1 through 17 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 132 over prior art               
          (Paper No. 39).                                                             
               (d) The Senior party’s contingent motion for judgment                  
          pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.633(a) on the ground that Christ claims              
          1 through 17 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Paper                  
          Nos. 40 and 41).                                                            
               (e) The Junior party’s motion for judgment pursuant to                 
          37 CFR § 1.633(a) on the grounds that the Blake claims are                  
          unpatentable for inequitable conduct (Paper No. 51).                        




               (f) The Senior party’s motions under 37 CFR                            
          1.635/1.618(a)/1.645 regarding the admissibility of evidence                
          submitted by Christ (Paper Nos. 94 and 101).                                
               (g) The Senior party’s motion under 37 CFR § 1.635 to                  
          grant leave to file a belated 37 CFR § 1.633(a)/35 U.S.C. §                 
          102(f) motion (Paper Nos. 113 and 114).                                     
               (h) The Senior party’s motion under 37 CFR § 1.635 for a               
          surrebuttal period (Paper No. 150).                                         
                      The Senior Party’s 37 CFR § 1.642 motion                        

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007