The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 26 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MASARU AKIBA, MASAYUKI NAKAGAWA, TOMOYOSHI TSURUFUJI, SHUNJI SUNAGA, and KOICHI ITO ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0530 Application No. 08/811,192 ____________ HEARD: NOVEMBER 28, 2000 ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 27, 28, and 35 through 46. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellants’ invention pertains to a fishing rod and to an inter-line fishing rod. A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 27Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007