Ex parte AKIBA et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.   
                                                              Paper No. 26        
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                    
                                   ____________                                   
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                
                                   ____________                                   
          Ex parte MASARU AKIBA, MASAYUKI NAKAGAWA, TOMOYOSHI TSURUFUJI,          
                           SHUNJI SUNAGA, and KOICHI ITO                          
                                   ____________                                   
                               Appeal No. 2000-0530                               
                            Application No. 08/811,192                            
                                   ____________                                   
                             HEARD: NOVEMBER 28, 2000                             
                                   ____________                                   
         Before COHEN, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.             
         COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      



                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                
              This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 27,            
         28, and 35 through 46.  These claims constitute all of the               
         claims remaining in the application.                                     


              Appellants’ invention pertains to a fishing rod and to an           
         inter-line fishing rod.  A basic understanding of the                    
         invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 27           








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007