The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WERNER-GEORG SCHRODER and CASPER TUGEL
_____________
Appeal No. 2000-0913
Application 09/067,123
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent
Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-7, 9-12, 14 and 16-20, all the claims
currently pending in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a driver restraint
system for an industrial truck. A further understanding of
the invention can be derived from a reading of independent
claims 1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007