THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ULRIC WEIDLE, EBERHARD RUSSMANN, KLAUS-PETER HIRTH,
TIBERIU DIAMANTSTEIN and BRIGITTE KALUZA
__________
Appeal No. 1996-1002
Application 07/988,9451
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
18-22 and 25-27, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
1 Application for patent filed March 10, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007