Ex parte FONG et al. - Page 1

                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                              

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for            
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                                                                                    Paper No. 34                       
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                Ex parte TUNG M. FONG, RUEY-RUEY C. HUANG,                                             
                                           and CATHERINE D. STRADER                                                    
                                               Appeal No. 1996-1204                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/090,369                                                
                                             HEARD:  January 13, 2000                                                  
              Before WINTERS, GRON, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final                  
              rejection of claims 25-30, which are all of the claims pending in the case.                              
                     Claims 25, 26, and 27 are representative of the claims on appeal, a copy of which                 
              are attached as an appendix to this decision.                                                            

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007