THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TUNG M. FONG, RUEY-RUEY C. HUANG, and CATHERINE D. STRADER ____________ Appeal No. 1996-1204 Application No. 08/090,369 ____________ HEARD: January 13, 2000 ____________ Before WINTERS, GRON, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judges. ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 25-30, which are all of the claims pending in the case. Claims 25, 26, and 27 are representative of the claims on appeal, a copy of which are attached as an appendix to this decision.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007