Ex parte FONG et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1996-1204                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/090,369                                                                               



                     The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                   
              Shigemoto et al. (Shigemoto), “Cloning and Expression of a Rat Neuromedin K Receptor                     
              cDNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 265(2), pp. 623-628 (1990).                                 
              Hopkins et al. (Hopkins), “Isolation and Characterization of the Human Lung NK-1                         
              Receptor cDNA,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Vol. 180(2),                        
              pp. 1110-1117 (1991).                                                                                    
              Gerard et al. (Gerard), “The Human Neurokinin A (Substance K) Receptor,” Journal of                      
              Biological Chemistry, Vol. 265(33), pp. 20455-20462 (1990).                                              
              Fraser et al. (Fraser), “Cloning, Sequence Analysis, and Permanent Expression of a                       
              Human " -Adrenergic Receptor in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells,” Journal of Biological                      
                       2                                                                                               
              Chemistry, vol. 264(20), pp. 11754-11761 (1989).                                                         
                     A reference relied upon by appellants:                                                            
              Dietl et al. (Dietl), “Phylogeny of Tachykinin Receptor Localization in the Vertebrate Central           
              Nervous System: Apparent Absence of Neurokinin-2 and Neurokinin-3 Binding Sites in the                   
              Human Brain,” Brain Research, Vol. 539, pp. 211-222 (1991).                                              

                                               Grounds of Rejection                                                    

                     Claims 25-28 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                         
              obviousness, the examiner relies upon Shigemoto, Hopkins, and Gerard.                                    
                     Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of                                   
              obviousness, the examiner relies upon Shigemoto, Hopkins, Gerard, and Fraser.                            
                     We reverse.                                                                                       





                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007