Appeal No. 1996-1813
Application No. 08/117,453
The examiner cited the following references in the
rejection
of the claims:
Harte et al. 3,792,272 February 12,
1974
(Harte)
Dawes 4,612,291 September 16, 1986
Inman, Jr. et al. 4,733,965 March 29, 1988
(Inman)
Maggard 4,963,745 October 16,
1990
(Maggard ‘745)
Maggard WO 91/15762 October 17, 1991
(Maggard WO‘762)
Maggard et al. 5,145,785 September 8, 1992
(Maggard ‘785)
Howard Mark et al., Advances in near Infrared Analyzer
Technology, Chemical Processing, February 1991, pp. 54-58.
(Mark)
The examiner entered the following rejections:
Claims 1-8 and 16-18 have been rejected as unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over either Maggard WO‘762 or Maggard
‘785 in combination with Inman.
Claims 9-15 have been rejected as unpatentable under 35
U.S.C. § 103 over either Maggard WO‘762 or Maggard ‘785 in
combination with Inman and Dawes.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007