Appeal No. 1996-1813 Application No. 08/117,453 has not directed us to motivation for adapting the gaseous analysis system of Harte to incorporate multiple liquid standard samples for calibration of the spectrophotometer. The addition of the teachings of the Inman and Mark references does not remedy the deficiencies of the Harte reference. Summary The rejection of claims 1-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Maggard ‘785 Inman and Dawes. We affirm. The rejection of claims 1-8 and 16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Maggard WO‘762 and Inman. We affirm. The rejection of claims 9-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Maggard WO‘762 and Inman and Dawes. We reverse. The rejection of claims 1-5, 7-8 and 16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Harte and Inman. We reverse. The rejection of claims 1-8 and 16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of Maggard ‘745, Inman and Mark. We reverse. 22Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007