Appeal No. 1996-1878 Application No. 07/982,203 the sole and the shoe upper and cooling, Gilch also requires that the adhesive is subjected to moisture and heating before pressing the sole and the shoe upper together. König, for instance, applies components of the adhesive composition with a two-component spraying apparatus, and passes the coated sheet through a drying channel to form an adhesive-coated sheet that is dry to the touch (column 4, lines 50 et seq. and column 5, lines 18 et seq.). As for Rumon, we agree with appellant that the referenced disclosure would not have suggested a modification of the Gilch method for bonding a sole to a shoe upper, since Rumon purposefully formulates a high viscosity adhesive composition which does not diffuse through adjacent layers of fabric and the like (column 2, lines 38 et seq.). Furthermore, insofar as the examiner concedes that the adhesive compositions of Rumon and König are not the same as Gilch's adhesive composition, it is incumbent upon the examiner to establish why it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the method of Gilch in light of the disclosures of Rumon and König. We have not ignored the examiner's statement at page 6 of the Answer that the appealed claims do not preclude the presence of additional steps by virtue of the "comprising" language, but it is not proper to read into the claims specific steps that are not disclosed or suggested in the supporting specification -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007