Appeal No. 1996-2009 Application No. 07/982,193 created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting and reverse the examiner's decision rejecting these claims under 35 U.S.C. ' 103. Appealed claim 1 is the only independent claim and is therefore representative of the claims on appeal. 1. An expression vector for site-specific integration and cell-specific gene expression comprising two inverted terminal repeats of adeno- associated virus 2 and at least one cassette comprising a promoter capable of effecting cell- specific expression wherein said promoter is operably linked to a heterologous gene, and wherein said cassette resides between said inverted terminal repeats. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Srivastava 5,252,479 Oct. 12, 1993 Izban et al. [Izban], "Cell-specific Expression of Mouse Albumin Promoter," J. Biol. Chem., 1989, Vol. 264, No. 16, pp. 9171-9179. Kim et al. [Kim], "Stable Reduction of Thymidine Kinase Activity in Cells Expressing High Levels of Anti-Sense RNA," Cell, 1985, Vol. 42, pp. 129-138. Lebkowski et al. [Lebkowski], "Adeno-Associated Virus: a Vector System for Efficient Introduction and Integration of DNA into a Variety of Mammalian Cell Types," Mol. Cell. Biol., 1988, Vol. 8, No. 10, pp. 3988-3996. Lu et al. [Lu], "Characterization of Adult Human Marrow Hematopoietic Progenitors Highly Enriched by Two-Color Cell Sorting with MY10 and Major Histocompatibility Class II Monoclonal Antibodies," J. Immunol., 1987, Vol. 139, No. 6, pp. 1823-1829. Appellant's admissions as set forth in the specification at page 11, line 19, to page 12, line 13, and page 28, lines 25-31. The rejections are: Claims 1-3, 7-10, 12, and 15-19 are rejected under the 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007