THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT J. CORNELL, DARILYN H. ROBERTS
and WILLIAM R. TRUE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2113
Application No. 08/192,220
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4. The
remaining claims in this application are claims 5 and 6, which
stand withdrawn from further consideration by the examiner as
drawn to a nonelected invention (Answer, page 1).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007