Appeal No. 1996-2113 Application No. 08/192,220 any convincing reason or suggestion to modify the acids of the primary references to acid anhydrides. For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness in view of the reference evidence. Therefore we need not address the sufficiency of appellants’ rebuttal evidence (Brief, page 4; Answer, page 4). In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the examiner’s rejections of claims 1 through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Hill, Parker, Kilbourne, and New alone or combined with Massie are reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007