Ex parte CORNELL et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1996-2113                                                        
          Application No. 08/192,220                                                  


          any convincing reason or suggestion to modify the acids of the              
          primary references to acid anhydrides.                                      
               For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the examiner              
          has not established a prima facie case of obviousness in view               
          of the reference evidence.  Therefore we need not address the               
          sufficiency of appellants’ rebuttal evidence (Brief, page 4;                
          Answer, page 4).  In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d                 
          1276, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987).  Accordingly, the examiner’s                   
          rejections of claims 1 through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          unpatentable over Hill, Parker, Kilbourne, and New alone or                 
          combined with Massie are reversed.                                          





               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              
          REVERSED                                                                    



                         BRADLEY R. GARRIS             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              

                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007