Ex parte SIMPSON et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 1996-2284                                                        
          Application No. 08/228,889                                                  


          the  image plane of the lens used for projecting images from                
          the object plane to the image plane of the lithography system               
          (Brief at page 5), as required by claims 1 and 5.  The                      
          examiner has not addressed this argument, which we find                     
          persuasive.  Detector 29 is not located in a part of the image              
          plane of lens 5, which contains only wafer 4.  Instead, the                 
          detector 29 is located in a different image plane which is                  
          optically coupled to the image plane of lens 5 (which contains              
          only wafer 4) by mirror 27, objective lens 26, prism 25, and                
          relay lens 28.  Consequently, we are reversing the rejection                
          of claims 1 and 5 based on Kosugi in view of Sakamoto as well               
          as the 103 rejection of dependent claims 2-4 over those                     
          references.                                                                 
          Summary                                                                     
               The rejection based on Mitome is affirmed as to claims 1               
          and 5 and reversed as to claims 2-4.  The rejection based on                
          Kosugi in view of Sakamoto is reversed as to claims 1-5.                    







                                         14                                           





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007