Ex parte BUYSCH et al. - Page 4




              Appeal No. 1996-2340                                                                                       
              Application 08/108,854                                                                                     


              aliphatic or cycloaliphatic alcohol in the presence of active carbon at a temperature range                
              from -10EC to +60EC.  Hoffmann, p. 2.  Hoffmann further discloses that the presence of                     
              active carbon during the reaction results in the production of a chloroformate having a                    
              higher degree of purity.  Id., pp. 4-5.                                                                    

                     In view of the teachings of the applied prior art as to the well known use of                       
              phosgene and a primary alcohol to produce a chloroformate, the teachings of Fieser II, in                  
              particular, as to the production of a chloroformate by reacting an aromatic alcohol and                    
              phosgene, and the teachings of Hoffmann as to the production of a highly purified                          
              chloroformate when the reaction is carried out in the presence of active carbon at a                       
              temperature range of -10EC to +60EC, we agree with the examiner that it would have been                    
              obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to produce a highly purified chloroformate by                  
              reacting an aromatic alcohol and phosgene in the presence of active carbon in the manner                   
              described in representative claim 1.  Accordingly, we affirm the rejection of Group I, claims              
              1 through 22.                                                                                              
                     In response, the appellants acknowledge that Fieser I, Fieser II and Grosse                         
              disclose reactions which are similar to that which is described in representative claim 1,                 
              however, they argue that the references fail to teach or suggest catalysis using active                    
              carbon.  Brief, p. 3.  The appellants further argue that Hoffmann fails to teach the                       
              production of chloroformates using an aromatic alcohol, or the use of active carbon as a                   


                                                           4                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007