Appeal No. 1996-2442
Application 08/062,021
identified a reason for combining the teachings of these two particular references, he
has not explained how those combined teachings would result in the primers specified
by the claim. In our judgment, the only reason or suggestion to combine the references
in the manner proposed by the examiner comes from appellants’ specification. On this
record, we find that the examiner has not met his burden of establishing a prima facie
case of obviousness.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007