Appeal No. 1996-2956
Application 08/152,192
37 USPQ2d 1237, 1239-40 (Fed. Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 519
U.S. 822 (1996), that for the determination of obviousness,
the court must answer whether one of ordinary skill in the art
who sets out to solve the problem and who had before him in
his workshop the prior art, would have been reasonably
expected to use the solution that is claimed by the
Appellants. However, "[o]bviousness may not be established
using hindsight or
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007