THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
_______________
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte GERARD CLAES
Appeal No. 1996-3076
Application 08/118,7731
HEARD: February 22, 2000
Before THOMAS, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed September 10, 1993,1
entitled "Method For Observing The Execution Of A Program
Loaded Into An Information Processing System And Apparatus For
Performing the Method," which is a continuation of Application
07/545,960, filed July 2, 1990, now abandoned, which claims
the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of
French Application 89.09158, filed July 7, 1989.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007