THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NAOMI FUJIMORI, AKIHIKO IKEGAYA, TAKAHIRO IMAI,
NOBUHIRO OTA and TAKAYUKI SHIBATA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3121
Application No. 08/115,783
____________
HEARD: February 23, 2000
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WARREN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1, 3-9, and 13-15.
Appealed claims 1 and 13 are representative and are
reproduced below:
1. A method for producing diamond by a CVD method
comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007