Ex parte FUJIMORI et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
          for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                               Paper No. 40           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
              Ex parte NAOMI FUJIMORI, AKIHIKO IKEGAYA, TAKAHIRO IMAI,                
                         NOBUHIRO OTA and TAKAYUKI SHIBATA                            
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1996-3121                                  
                             Application No. 08/115,783                               
                                    ____________                                      
                              HEARD:  February 23, 2000                               
                                    ____________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and WARREN, Administrative                    
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                 
          final rejection of claims 1, 3-9, and 13-15.                                
               Appealed claims 1 and 13 are representative and are                    
          reproduced below:                                                           
               1.        A method for producing diamond by a CVD method               
          comprising:                                                                 







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007