Appeal No. 1996-3399
Application 08/295,150
August 15, 1996, which bears no official paper number in the
file wrapper. A supplemental appeal brief filed on February
22, 2000 does not bear on the merits of the issues on the
appeal.
OPINION
We reverse the rejection of claims 49 through 60
under the enablement provision of the first paragraph of 35
U.S.C.
§ 112. The examiner's basis of this rejection appears to
focus upon page 6 of the specification as filed to the extent
it relates to an obviousness miscalculation of a current
value. The examiner complains that the corrected value is
much higher than the applicant's cited safe limit of this
current value. The
examiner is of the belief that this so-called safety limit
provides the only basis for the recited safety features in
many of the claims on appeal.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007