Ex Parte BAKKER et al - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                    
             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written              
             for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                                                Paper No. 20             
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                    
                                              ____________                                               
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                              ____________                                               
                           Ex parte DIRKJAN BAKKER, JOHANNES J. GROTE,                                   
                                  and CLEMENS A. VAN BLITTERSWIJK                                        
                                              ____________                                               
                                         Appeal No. 1996-3547                                            
                                     Application No. 08/089,8541                                         
                                              ____________                                               
                                                ON BRIEF                                                 
                                              ____________                                               
            Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                  
            KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to                            
            allow claims 13-19 and 68-107, which are all of the claims                                   
            pending in this application.                                                                 






                  1 Application for patent filed July 21, 1993.  According to                            
            appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of                                    
            Application 07/907,674, filed July 2, 1992, now abandoned; which                             
            is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/479,197, filed                                   
            February 13, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part                            
            of Application 07/240,810, filed September 2, 1988, now                                      
            abandoned.                                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007