THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIRKJAN BAKKER, JOHANNES J. GROTE,
and CLEMENS A. VAN BLITTERSWIJK
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3547
Application No. 08/089,8541
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 13-19 and 68-107, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1 Application for patent filed July 21, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/907,674, filed July 2, 1992, now abandoned; which
is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/479,197, filed
February 13, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/240,810, filed September 2, 1988, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007