Ex parte YOUNG et al. - Page 9




          Appeal NO. 1996-3683                                                         
          Application 08/207,393                                                       




          groups" present in the binder.2                                              
               At the time appellants filed their application, any                     
          organic chemist of ordinary skill in the art would have                      
          understood the term "carboxyl group" to be the carboxylic acid               
          radical -COOH. Thus, it is not entirely clear to what the term               
          "free" refers in the phrase "free carboxyl groups" since, by                 
          definition, a carboxyl group is "free" because it is not bound               
          to any other moiety as in, for example, an ester, amide or a                 
          salt.  Thus, appellants' disclosure at page 9 of their                       
          specification would seem to be directed to carboxylic acid-                  
          containing compounds useful as binders.                                      
               Considered with the disclosure at pages 13 and 14, it                   
          appears that the binders are either themselves liquid                        
          compounds which may be applied to the fibers neat or the                     
          binders may be "applied in liquid form" to the fibers as                     
          emulsions or solutions. As we understand the term "free                      


           Original claims constitute part of the original2                                                                       
          disclosure    of a patent application.  See In re Gardner,                   
          475 F.2d 1389,        1391, 177 USPQ 396, 397 (CCPA 1973); In                
          re Anderson,                                                                 
               471 F.2d 1237, 1238, 1239, 176 USPQ 331, 332 (CCPA                      
          1973);                                                                       
                In re Myers, 410 F.2d 420, 427, 161 USPQ 668, 673 (CCPA                
          1969).                                                                       

                                          9                                            





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007