THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TAMIJI KAMAKURA, NORIYOSHI TANAKA, YUJI BABA,
KIMIYOSHI NAMIWA, YUKIO TATSUMI and MASATO NAMIKI
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0042
Application No. 07/992,177
____________
HEARD: February 24, 2000
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 3 through 5, 8 and 9,
which are the only claims remaining in this application.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to a
refrigerant composition comprising a fluorocarbon coolant and
a lubricant compound which is a specified polyoxyalkylene
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007