THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FUMIE SATO, KATSUAKI MIYAJI
and TAKEHIRO AMANO
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0158
Application No. 08/026,681
____________
HEARD: February 22, 2000
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 and 17 through 23. Claims 3 through 7
and 14 through 16, the remaining claims in this application,
stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being
drawn to nonelected inventions.
According to appellants (Brief, page 4), the appealed
claims are grouped as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007