Appeal No. 1997-0160
Application No. 08/073,985
confirmed the nonentry of the proposed amendments to claims 4, 15 and 24 in the answer
(Paper No. 52, pp. 2-3, § 8). By failing to respond to § 8 in the answer, appellants have
acquiesced that claims 4, 15 and 24 are as stated in the answer.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 and 4-24 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Mullis in view of Hogan and Frohman is
reversed.
REVERSED
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
WILLIAM F. SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CAROL A. SPIEGEL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007