Ex parte WANG et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
          for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.

                                                               Paper No. 24           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                     Ex parte BOR-PING E. WANG, ELLIOT I. BANK                        
                                and RONALD A. EPSTEIN                                 
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-0186                                  
                             Application No. 08/314,568                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before WINTERS, HANLON, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        




                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the final                 
          rejection of claims 1-22, all of the claims pending in the                  
          application.  The claims on appeal are directed to a catalyst               








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007