THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DARYL J. CAREY, LYNN L. LADOUCEUR and DANIEL W. MUSZYNSKI ____________ Appeal No. 1997-0200 Application No. 08/202,860 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 28, 33, 37, and 38. Claims 1-27 and 29 have been canceled. Claims 30-32 and 34-36 have been indicated by the Examiner as containing allowable subject matter. The claimed invention relates to a method and apparatus for balancing an out-of-balance transaction in a check imagePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007