THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI TSUKAHARA
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0240
Application No. 08/163,761
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 17, all of the claims pending in the present
application.
The claimed invention relates to a client server system
in which the operating status of each client machine device is
monitored. More particularly, Appellant indicates at pages 6
through 8 of the specification that, on detection of a work
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007