Ex parte TSUKAHARA - Page 1




                         THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                    

            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written               
            for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.              

                                                                             Paper No. 22                
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                             ____________                                                
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                             ____________                                                
                                    Ex parte HIROSHI TSUKAHARA                                           
                                             ____________                                                
                                        Appeal No. 1997-0240                                             
                                    Application No. 08/163,761                                           
                                             ____________                                                
                                               ON BRIEF                                                  
                                             ____________                                                
            Before MARTIN, BARRETT, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                                  
            Judges.                                                                                      
            RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                               
            claims 1 through 17, all of the claims pending in the present                                
            application.                                                                                 
                  The claimed invention relates to a client server system                                
            in which the operating status of each client machine device is                               
            monitored.  More particularly, Appellant indicates at pages 6                                
            through 8 of the specification that, on detection of a work                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007