Appeal No. 1997-0240
Application No. 08/163,761
control means for controlling each said database data
generation task and said data base data processing task in
each of said client machine devices and for executing at least
one of said processing and generation functions originally
scheduled to be executed by at least one other of said client
machine devices which is in said work load concentration state
or said abnormal
state, when at least one of said work load concentration state
or said abnormal state in said other client machine devices is
detected by said detecting means.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference:1
Parad 5,369,570 Nov. 29,
1994
(Filed Nov. 14, 1991)
Claims 1 through 17 stand finally rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art in
view of Parad.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief and Answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
1The Examiner additionally relies on Appellant’s
admissions as to the prior art at pages 1-5 of the
specification.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007