Ex parte MUELLER et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
           for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                 Paper No. 19         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte REINHARD MUELLER,                              
                                     KURT SEIDEL,                                     
                                 DETLEF HOLLENBERG and                                
                                      ANJA PATTEN                                     
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-0327                                 
                              Application No. 08/204,150                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before PAK, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 6 through 11, which are all of the claims               
          pending in this application.                                                
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to an aqueous cleaning                   
          composition useful for hair washing or rinsing while improving              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007