Appeal No. 1997-0327 Page 8 Application No. 08/204,150 In summary, the only motivation and factual basis we can locate in support of the examiner's stated rejection is the description of appellants’ invention in their specification. Hence, on this record, it is our view that the examiner used impermissible hindsight when rejecting the claims. Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 6-11 under 35 U.S.C. � 103 as being unpatentable over Hoeffkes is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007