Ex parte BALACHANDRAN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-0534                                                        
          Application 08/171,904                                                      


          Angstroms in diameter; and                                                  
               (c) combining said ultra-fined grained superparamagnetic               
          particles with said powdered high temperature superconductor                
          to form a solid mass comprised of crystalline grains of said                
          superparamagnetic particles and said powdered high temperature              
          superconductor, said superparasmagnetic particles constituting              
          about 0.1 -0.3% by weight of the total, and having grain                    


          boundaries between said grains of said powdered high                        
          temperature superconductor and a dispersion of said                         
          superparamagnetic particles on the grain boundaries, thereby                
          enhancing intergrain critical current density of said high                  
          temperature superconducting material.                                       
               The Examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Wijeyesekera et al. (Wijeyesekera) 4,999,338      Mar. 12, 1991             


               Claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 to 9 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as well as under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          102 over Wijeyesekera and under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                        
          Wijeyesekera.                                                               
               Rather than repeat the positions and the arguments of                  
          Appellants and the Examiner, we make reference to the brief                 
          and the answer for their respective positions.                              
               OPINION                                                                
              We have considered the rejections advanced by the                      

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007