Ex parte JOLY et al. - Page 1




                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                      
                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for         
                      publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                                                       Paper No. 13           
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                ____________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                ____________                                                  
                Ex parte CHRISTIAN JOLY, ZARIR SARKARI, RAVICHANDRAN RAMACHANDRAN,                            
                                    SARIKA AGRAWAL and SANJAY ADKAR                                           
                                                ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal No. 1997-0553                                             
                                           Application No. 08/409,191                                         
                                                ____________                                                  
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                ____________                                                  

            Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
            DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                

                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-28,           
            which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                          
                   We AFFIRM.                                                                                 
                                               BACKGROUND                                                     

                   The appellants’ invention relates to a synthesis shell generation and use in ASIC          
            design.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary             
            claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007