THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SEIICHI NISHIMURA and TATSUYUKI MASUDA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0736
Application No. 08/384,916
______________
HEARD: MAY 18, 2000
_______________
Before COHEN, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1, 3, 5, 7 through 11, 15, and 16, all of the
claims remaining in the application, as amended (Paper No. 9)
subsequent to the final rejection.
The invention addresses a V-type two-cycle crankshaft
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007