Appeal No. 1997-0782
Application 08/158,029
the brief to the portions of the specification which explain
in detail the features. We read them that way and we believe
that the artisan would as well. Reading certain limitations
in light of the specification is not equivalent to reading
into the claim limitations from the specification. The claims
reasonably define the invention disclosed. Therefore, for all
these reasons, the rejection of claims 1 through 15 under the
second paragraph of
35 U.S.C. § 112 is reversed.
Turning lastly to the rejection of claims 1 through 15
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cichelli, we
also reverse this rejection. Cichelli's invention is a
sophisticated Teletext system which essentially broadcasts
one-way to the various receivers information from the head end
system of Figure 1. There is a repetitive transmission of
this information from this head end system to each receiver
which enables the user there to select which portions of that
continually recurring one-way data message the user desires.
Thus, there is no true interactive nature as this term is
conventionally used in the art in the Cichelli system. In
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007