THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAKAO NAKAMURA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-0858
Application 08/323,065
______________
HEARD: April 20, 2000
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1, 3 through 5, 8 and 12 through 14 which are all of
the claims pending in the application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for
preparing a film formed of an oxide superconductor grown on a
substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. This appealed subject
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007