Appeal No. 1997-0858
Application No. 08/323,065
derived from the applied prior art. W.L. Gore & Associates
Inc. v. Garlock, Inc. 721 F.2d 1540, 1553, 220 USPQ 303, 312-
313.
Under the foregoing circumstances, we cannot sustain the
examiner's § 103 rejection of claims 1, 5, 8 and 12 through 14
as being unpatentable over Harada in view of Wang and
DeLozanne. Moreover, since the deficiency of this rejection
is shared by the
rejections of dependent claims 3 and 4, these dependent claims
rejections also cannot be sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
JOHN D. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS AND
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007