Appeal No. 1997-0888
Application 08/367,683
rejection of claims 11, 22, 33, and 44 and adds Chandler '029
and Chandler '936 for the rejection of claims 7, 18, 29, and
40.
We refer to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 22) (pages
referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the Examiner's
position and to the Brief (Paper No. 21) (pages referred to as
"Br__") for Appellants' arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
Appellants argue (Br8): "Dvorzsak does not teach using a
double template to locate a single acquisition target. If
anything, Dvorzsak teaches the use of two distinct single
templates to locate two distinct acquisition targets . . . ."
The Examiner finds that "Dvorzsak teaches using a double
template (Dvorzsak: figures 3A and 3B or figure[s] 3C and 3D)
to locate a single acquisition target (Dvorzsak: 10 or 10' in
figures 1 and 2)" (EA8). We think Appellants correctly
summarize the Examiner's position as considering patterns 14
and 16 as part of a single acquisition target (the coded
document 10) and signatures 26 and 28 as halves of a double
template.
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007