Appeal No. 1997-1197
Application 08/130,255
figure 6, which holds 200 words, and is considered to
correspond to memory storing a frame of pixel data. Claim 16
does not preclude the frame of pixel data from being read out
a block at a time where the blocks correspond to the size of
the RAMs.
For the reasons stated above, the rejection of claim 16
is sustained. Claim 17 is not separately argued and,
therefore, falls with claim 16. The rejection of claim 17 is
sustained.
Claims 1 and 2
Appellants argue that there is no reading out of image
data from the memory in different sequences (Br14). We
disagree for the reasons discussed in connection with
claim 16, where the claimed memory corresponds to the page
memory in Kajihara, not the buffer memory 15.
Appellants argue that "claim 1 requires that the image
data be scanned on a video display in the same prescribed
sequence that the image data is read out of memory" (Br13-14).
The Examiner does not address this argument.
We find that Kajihara does not scan the image data in the
same prescribed sequence that the image data is read out of
- 11 -
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007