Ex parte CLEMENCE et al. - Page 1




                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                               

                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication     
                     in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                                                                                             Paper No. 23               
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                        
                             Ex parte FRANCOIS CLEMENCE, ODILE LE MARTRET,                                              
                                 FRANCOISE DELEVALLEE, and MICHEL FORTIN,                                               
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 1997-1280                                                    
                                              Application No. 08/356,912                                                
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                               HEARD: March 7, 2000                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                        
              Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                
              LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       

                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims                
              31 through 33  which are all the claims in the application.1                                              
                                                   THE INVENTION                                                        

                     The invention is directed to enantiomers and diastereoisomers of N-[2,3-dihydro-2-                 
              (1-pyrrolidinyl)-1H-inden-1-yl]-N-methyl-benzene- acetamide derivatives.  The derivatives                 

                     1                                                                                                  






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007