THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCOIS CLEMENCE, ODILE LE MARTRET,
FRANCOISE DELEVALLEE, and MICHEL FORTIN,
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1280
Application No. 08/356,912
____________
HEARD: March 7, 2000
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims
31 through 33 which are all the claims in the application.1
THE INVENTION
The invention is directed to enantiomers and diastereoisomers of N-[2,3-dihydro-2-
(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1H-inden-1-yl]-N-methyl-benzene- acetamide derivatives. The derivatives
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007