THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EVELYN CHIN, FRANCIS M. HOULIHAN
and OMKARAM NALAMASU
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1301
Application No. 08/079,310
____________
HEARD: May 18, 2000
____________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 5. Claims 6 to
8, the remaining claims in this application, stand withdrawn
from further consideration by the examiner (Brief, page 2;
Final Rejection, cover page).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007