Ex parte CHIN et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 30           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                     Ex parte EVELYN CHIN, FRANCIS M. HOULIHAN                        
                                and OMKARAM NALAMASU                                  
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-1301                                  
                             Application No. 08/079,310                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                 HEARD: May 18, 2000                                  
                                    ____________                                      

          Before WARREN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                       
          examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 5.  Claims 6 to              
          8, the remaining claims in this application, stand withdrawn                
          from further consideration by the examiner (Brief, page 2;                  
          Final Rejection, cover page).                                               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007