THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS ACQUAVIVA and PAUL W. MOREHOUSE, JR.
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1425
Application No. 08/520,228
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 24 through 33, all claims pending in this application.
The invention relates to an electrophotographic
printing machine that optimizes the quality of an image
produced on a substrate (e.g. paper) by modifying the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007