Appeal No. 1997-1425
Application No. 08/520,228
no evidence in the record that the prior art suggested a
detector for surface roughness in a recording device, and all
claims require such, we will not sustain the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 24 through 33.
We have not sustained the rejection of claims 24 through
33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the Examiner's
decision is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007