THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RUSSELL F. LEWIS
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1572
Application 07/792,5341
___________
HEARD: December 6, 1999
___________
Before THOMAS, LALL and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 7 to 12 and 16 2
1 Application for patent filed November 12, 1991.
2 There are two entries in the record marked as final
rejections, [paper nos. 14 and 23]. This appeal is from the
final rejection marked as paper no. 23, the other having been
withdrawn. An amendment after the final rejection was filed
[paper no. 24], however, it contained only a request for
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007