Appeal No. 1997-1584 Application No. 08/353,375 which Appellants could have made but chose not to make in the Brief have not been considered [see 37 CFR § 1.192(a)]. With respect to representative independent claim 1, the Examiner, as the basis for the obviousness rejection, proposes to modify the image retrieval system disclosure of Saki by relying on Kimura to supply the missing teaching of utilizing an analog signal generator to select a desired region from overlapping regions. In the Examiner’s view (Answer, page 4), the skilled artisan would have found it obvious to substitute the analog signal generating stylus of Kimura for the pointing device of Saki to provide a high precision determination of detected coordinates. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007