Ex parte KAWAGUCHI et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1997-1584                                                        
          Application No. 08/353,375                                                  


          which Appellants could have made but chose not to make in the               
          Brief have not been considered [see 37 CFR § 1.192(a)].                     
               With respect to representative independent claim 1, the                
          Examiner, as the basis for the obviousness rejection, proposes              
          to modify the image retrieval system disclosure of Saki by                  
          relying on Kimura to supply the missing teaching of utilizing               
          an analog signal generator to select a desired region from                  
          overlapping regions.  In the Examiner’s view (Answer, page 4),              
          the skilled artisan would have found it obvious to substitute               
          the analog signal generating stylus of Kimura for the pointing              
          device of Saki to provide a high precision determination of                 
          detected coordinates.                                                       
















                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007